World Accreditation Day 2011
Study into the value of ISO 9001
IAF after 20 years
Closer Cooperation
Accredited certification delivers real added value
World Accreditation Day - June 9th 2014
GLOBALG.A.P. receives IAF endorsement
Specifying Accreditation in Regulation
Self-Certification Is Not a Real Thing
Promoting Accreditation at the WTO Public Forum
IAF MLA Annual Report 2013
World Accreditation Day 2015
Boosting the trade capacity of Least Developed Countries
EA Celebrating its 15th Anniversary in 2015
Second OECD meeting of International Organisations
2015 EOQ Presidential Georges Borel Awards
IAF MLA Annual Report 2014
Making Trade Work - ILAC and IAF to host session
World Accreditation Day 2015 Celebrations - Kenya
Interview with Randy Dougherty, IAF Chair (Spanish)
BIPM Workshop on Carbon Measurements
Assuring Success Through Accredited Certification
PAC 20th Anniversary Celebrations a Great Success
Publication of ISO 9001:2015
Greater Recognition for Accreditation
ISO Survey 2014
ANAB Acquires Laboratory Accreditation Bureau
World Accreditation Day - 2016
World Bank - GFDDR Report Cites Accreditaton
SADCAS Admitted as an Accreditation Body Member
IAF MLA Annual Report 2015
UNIDO: Experience in the Market Surveillance of ISO 9001 QMS
Standards and Accreditation in the Insurance Sector
2017 IAF-ILAC Mid-Term Meetings
World Accreditation Day 2017
African Year of Quality Infrastructure
USEPA Rule on Formaldehyde Emission Standards
FAMI-QS Signs Agreement of Cooperation with FQSI
IAF, ILAC and JAS-ANZ Communications Workshops
UNECE Trade Recommendations Reference Accreditation
3P-EVP - Third Party Effectiveness Verification
The Value of Management Systems International Standards
Strong Progress on IAF Database
2017 IAF/ILAC Joint Annual Meetings
Business Benefits Website
IAF Participates in DCMAS Network Meeting
Growing Public Healthcare Support by IAF
IAF Welcomes New Members and MLA Signatories
ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 Transition Deadline
Engaging with the Insurance Industry
2016 ISO Survey
2016 IAF MLA Annual Report
IAF MD 20 Workshop Videos
Accredited Certification and the Supply Chain
IAF Database of Accredited Certificates
IAF Resolution 2017-13
IAF Participates in COP 23
IAF Signs MLA Agreement With IPC
IAF Endorses FAMI-QS Certification Scheme
IAF Renews MoU with UNIDO and ILAC
Joint IAF-ILAC Mid-Term Meetings
U.S. FDA Recognizes ANAB for FSMA
Trade Benefits of the IAF MLA
Expected Outcomes of Mgmt Systems Certification
World Accreditation Day 2018
IAF-ILAC Communications Committees Update
New Global Partnership with GFSI
2015 ISO Transition Deadline Approaching
April 2018 IAF Technical Committee Meeting Highlights
World Accreditation Day 2018 Video Now Available
April 2018 IAF MLA MC Meeting Highlights
ISO 9001 Certification Used as Measure in GII
2018 Business Improvement Forum
Insurer publishes report into value of standards and accreditation
2018 IAF-ILAC Joint Annual Meetings
Key ISO management system standard revisions published
2017 IAF MLA Annual Report
Anti-Bullying Publicly Available Specification Published
Upcoming IAF-ILAC Meetings in Singapore
Transition Rate Confirmed at 93% from IAF Members
IAF, ILAC and OIML Renew Tripartite MoU
IAF Signs MoU with IHAF and ILAC
IAF Signs MoU with ILAC and the World Bank
INetQI Meets in Geneva
PAC Provides Support for ISO 13485 Training

The Value of the Implementation and Certification of Management Systems International Standards

By Pedro Alves

The implementation and certification of Management Systems International Standards, such as ISO 9001 and ISO 14001, has achieved high international recognition with more than 1 million organizations with their Quality Management Systems certified worldwide. Researchers have been paying considerable attention to this theme and the number of published articles has grown robustly (as clearly evidenced by the website) to illustrate the value of accredited conformity assessment and provide links to relevant independent research.

A 2017 study (recently submitted for publication), sponsored by The International Certification Network (IQNet) with the fundamental contribution of researchers from the Instituto Politecnico do Porto-Portugal and the Universidade Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid-Spain, aims to bring a longitudinal time perspective to this area of research, analyzing articles published since 1996, on the benefits of Management Systems Certification (MSC).

The research was supported with a Bibliometric Study, with data collected from Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Research Gate databases. Following the detailed analysis of the journal titles, article abstracts and their full content, an evaluation scale was applied to assess if the results support the existence of a positive relationship between MSC and economic, financial or stakeholder results.

The results show a steep increase in the number of publications addressing Management Systems Certification benefits. Most originate from Europe (48%) and East Asia and Pacific (23%), with Spain as the clear leading country, accounting for 43% of the total number of articles published between 1996 and April 2017. Other countries with highlighted contributions are USA, Malaysia, Italy, China, Brazil, Portugal, Greece, Australia, Croatia, and Canada, representing 11.6% of the total of published articles. Additionally, analyzing the content of the published papers, 91% have a single country scope, while 50% address only one activity sector.

The systematic review of the selected papers shows that Management Systems adoption and certification brings fairly positive benefits (average 2.34 in a 1 to 5 Likert type scale) for the certified organizations, although some variations are observed.

Analyzing the data through a different perspective, it can be noticed that approximately 90% of the research identified positive relations between MSC and economical, financial or stakeholder related results.

Although the current analysis points to the existence of a positive relationship between MSC and organizational performance and results, there are some inconsistencies and several studies that have found a neutral or even negative relationship between MSC and organizational performance and results.

These inconsistencies might be explained by concerns over reliability and lack of validation of measures, sampling and biases errors (e.g., Quality Managers might report more favorable impacts of QMS than CEOs), or no explanations for cause and effect relationships. Time is also an important variable to be considered, as some benefits can be realized in the short term (e.g. compliance with customer requirements, financial results) while others only in the long term (e.g., company image and reputation, employee motivation).

As so, IQNet (with the support of relevant academic organizations around the world) will continue to sponsor future studies to promote additional conclusions. Since more researchers are also focusing on non QMS/EMS studies, we expect that future analyses may also provide differentiated and representative results for other types of MSC.


Forgot Password?

> Publications

Access and download IAF publications
Click Here>>

> IAF Members
& Signatories

Contact details for IAF members, associates and related bodies
Click Here>>


Subscribe to email Newsletter
Click Here>>

IAF MLA - Directory - Publications - News & Events - Contact Us - FAQ - Home

© Copyright, International Accreditation Forum, Inc

Website marketing by Aim IT, Sydney
Web site design Plus 5 Media

Certified Once
Accepted Everywhere